Re: Duff's Playboy Blog
Why Glenn Beck Is a Symptom of What Is Wrong with America
by Duff McKagan
This Week: Why Glenn Beck Is a Symptom of What Is Wrong with America
News broke last week that many major sponsors advertising on Fox host Glenn Beck’s nightly show will be pulling out. If any of you saw his “Obama is a racist” segment, you would probably agree that having your corporate name associated with this loose cannon is most likely a terrible idea.
The thing that gets me about Glenn Beck is that I used to think he was pretty cool. His CNN show a couple years back was a show that I’d sit and watch. Back then, Beck seemed to have a cat-bird seat somewhere in the political middle, where he’d toy with guests and challenge the viewer. Now, however, he has apparently bought into some weird angle that I am sure he hoped would keep a certain type of advertiser supporting of his gig for life. I am glad to see this scheme has backfired. What a moron.
I have previously addressed the problem I have with certain factions of the left or right trying to spin the other side into the worst possible light. At what point do we just drop the politics and try to do what is best for our country? Aren’t two wars and the biggest economic recession in 80 years enough to get us to unite for the purpose of making a safer and stronger country? Let’s all get with the damn program.
This polarization has got to stop. I can’t in good conscience just point my righteous finger at the conservatives. Liberal media, too, skews the news to fit their political motives, albeit with less bluster and shouting.
This brings me to an idea that just might work: Let’s run the U.S. like a corporation. That’s right, let’s stop trying to get Presidents ousted as soon as they take office and instead do the opposite—make terms an eight-year commitment. Would Lee Iacocca have been able to realize all of his reforms if he had to worry about a re-election two years into his reign at Chrysler? Or take Bill Gates. This man is a visionary and is constantly unveiling new ventures that you realize are the result of a well-thought-out, long-term plan.
Corporate security at a company like Microsoft is taken very seriously. Do you think Bill Gates would commit his firm to some ill-thought-out war in Iraq on a rumor? Hell no. But that’s not my point really.
A guy like Reagan got the country close to the way he thought it should be run, and Clinton pretty much spent his time tearing that apart and remolding it according to his vision. George W. Bush in turn tore apart Clinton’s efforts and now Obama is reversing a lot of Bush’s work. It’s kind of like a damn rollercoaster if you really think about it, right?
Has there ever been a sort of “happy medium” in the history of this country—a time when a workable balance between social programs and business incentives was struck? A balance where Democrats and Republicans were both happy with the direction of this country? It seems that we could indeed come up with one and this could possibly turn back the current tide of anger if not alleviate this antiquated (in my mind at least) two-party obnoxiousness.
That’s right, run this country like a great corporation—with pensions and health insurance, security and growth potential, research and development. We would act as the shareholders, with the power to axe the acting boss, or at least put a chief on notice. Does this sound too much like a utopian dream? You may argue that we need the checks and balances the legislature and courts were originally set up to provide. I guess I am just getting real sick of politics and wonder whether TV and its bellicose talking heads will ever again let an acting President just do his or her job.
http://www.playboy.com/articles/duffono index.html
Thanks to FunkyMonkey
